Evidence mapPaperPMID 42377409Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2026

Disruption of bacterial membranes by plant extracts of celandine and dandelion: microbiological and langmuir monolayer studies.

Agnieszka Gonet-Surówka, Kamil Drożdż, Anita Wnętrzak, Anna Chachaj-Brekiesz, Dawid Lupa, Sławomir Wybraniec, Łukasz Kozioł, Ewa Łopuszyńska, Monika Brzychczy-Włoch, Patrycja Dynarowicz-Latka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agnieszka Gonet-SurówkaFaculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, Kraków, 30-387, Poland. agnieszka.gonet-surowka@uj.edu.pl.
Kamil DrożdżFaculty of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Molecular Medical Microbiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Czysta 18, Kraków, 31-121, Poland.
Anita WnętrzakFaculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, Kraków, 30-387, Poland.
Anna Chachaj-BrekieszFaculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, Kraków, 30-387, Poland.
Dawid LupaFaculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Łojasiewicza 11, Kraków, 30-348, Poland.
Sławomir WybraniecFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Department of Chemical Technology and Environmental Analytics, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, Kraków, 31-155, Poland.
Łukasz KoziołCUT Doctoral School, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Department C-1, Warszawska 24, Krakow, 31-155, Poland.
Ewa ŁopuszyńskaFaculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, Kraków, 30-387, Poland.
Monika Brzychczy-WłochFaculty of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Molecular Medical Microbiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Czysta 18, Kraków, 31-121, Poland.
Patrycja Dynarowicz-LatkaFaculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, Kraków, 30-387, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article presents a study on the disruption of the bacterial membrane by celandine (CME) and dandelion (TOE) extracts containing bioactive compounds responsible for their antibacterial activity. The in vitro microbiological tests showed antibacterial effect both on Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) pathogenic bacteria species. However, in the case of celandine herb extract, the effect was stronger, especially for Gram-positive bacteria. For a deeper understanding of the mechanism of antibacterial action, both studied extracts were subjected to biophysical studies on artificial bacterial lipid membranes, modeled with the Langmuir monolayers technique. The monolayer investigations were performed using two approaches: (i) monitoring the penetration of extracts injected into the aqueous subphase beneath a compressed lipid film, and (ii) comparing surface pressure-area isotherms recorded on a subphase with and without addition of extracts. These experiments confirmed the activity of TOE and CME at the membrane level, demonstrating the penetration of extract components into the membranes and their fluidizing effect. AFM analysis of the domain structures of the films transferred onto solid supports (Langmuir-Blodgett) revealed differences in film topography induced by the extracts and are in a good agreement with the results of biological tests and analytical analyses of the tested extracts. These findings confirm that the stronger antibacterial effect of CME, associated with a higher content of bioactive compounds, exerts a more destructive effect on the bacterial lipid membranes compared to TOE.

Indexed as

Bacterial lipid model membranesBioactive compoundsCelandine extractDandelion extractPathogenic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID42377409

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.