Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42377475›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Optimizing the management of laparoscopic equipment in low-resource settings: a SAGES White Paper.

Joseph Nderitu, Linda Zhang, Robert Parker, Abdourahmane Ndong, Nia Zalamea Ducklo, Maurice Mugao, Benjamin Njihia, Carlos Colunga, Michael Mwachiro, Christine Namugenyi and 3 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Joseph NderituAIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, Kenya.
Linda ZhangIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Robert ParkerTenwek Hospital, Tenwek, Kenya.
Abdourahmane NdongUniversité Gaston Berger, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Nia Zalamea DuckloUniversity of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Maurice MugaoChuka County Referral Hospital, Chuka, Kenya.
Benjamin NjihiaAvenue Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Carlos ColungaUniversidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Michael MwachiroAvenue Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Christine NamugenyiThika Level V Hospital, Thika, Kenya.
Mwanje Bright AndersonMengo Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Ana CarasquillaHospital CIMA, San Jose, Costa Rica.
Richard DavisAIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, Kenya. rich.davis.paacs@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4222-6406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of well-maintained, functional equipment is a major limiting factor for laparoscopic surgery. As the practice of laparoscopy expands into low-resource settings (LRS), there is limited guidance on how laparoscopic equipment should be tailored to local environments to ensure appropriate maintenance, sustainability, and cost reduction. This White Paper, developed by the SAGES Global Affairs Committee, examines the challenges and opportunities associated with introducing laparoscopic equipment into LRS. It highlights the innovative strategies employed by surgeons to train and perform minimally invasive procedures effectively while ensuring the continued functionality of essential equipment.

methodsKey stakeholders engaged in the global surgery field began by identifying and prioritizing the most pressing challenges and considerations related to the adaptation of laparoscopic surgery in LRS. This initial framework served as the basis for engaging additional experienced practitioners who have worked extensively in LRS. Their insights, grounded in firsthand knowledge and practical experience, were synthesized into a comprehensive report that provides both strategic guidance and actionable recommendations for advancing minimally invasive surgery in LRS.

resultsThis paper outlines key adaptations that make laparoscopic surgery more accessible and sustainable in LRS. Simulation-based training, using low-cost or homemade trainers, helps overcome limited access to commercial equipment and improve technical skills and equipment familiarity. Various innovative programs have successfully integrated telesimulation, local materials, and structured curricula to build capacity. Procurement strategies emphasizing reusables, durable tools, local sourcing, and thoughtful donations can ensure reliability and affordability. Sustainability efforts include proper sterilization, maintenance, and equipment care using low-cost, locally adapted methods. Alternatives to CO₂ insufflation, such as gasless laparoscopy or air insufflation, offer cost-effective solutions but may compromise outcomes; further research is needed. Intraoperative patient safety can be addressed through creative positioning solutions and low-cost ergonomic practices to prevent staff injury. Overall, these locally driven innovations demonstrate how LRS surgeons are leading practical, cost-effective approaches that not only improve access and quality but also offer valuable lessons for high-resource settings.

conclusionLaparoscopic surgery will continue to grow in LRS worldwide. Strategies for the sustainability of laparoscopic equipment are essential to address the resource constraints faced by surgeons. These adaptations also offer high-income countries valuable opportunities to learn effective methods for sustainability and cost reduction through reverse innovation.

Indexed as

LaparoscopesLaparoscopyHumansResource-Limited SettingsSimulation TrainingEquipment sustainabilityGlobal surgeryLaparoscopyLow-resource settingsMedical device procurementReverse innovationSimulation-based training

Identifiers

PMID42377475
PMCPMC13053375

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.