ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
The role of intermittent fasting in modulating oxidative stress: a narrative review.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nutrition as Modulator of Oxidative Stress in Cancer Prevention and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intermittent fasting (IF) has gained increasing attention as a lifestyle intervention potentially influencing metabolic health and aging, partly through modulation of oxidative stress. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the effects of IF on oxidative pathways at molecular, cellular, and clinical levels. Mechanistically, IF induces metabolic switching from glucose to fatty acid and ketone utilization, activating interconnected nutrient-sensing pathways such as AMPK, SIRT1, and NRF2, as well as autophagy, which collectively contribute to improved mitochondrial function, enhanced antioxidant defenses, and reduced reactive oxygen species production. Preclinical studies consistently demonstrate that IF can reduce oxidative damage, upregulate endogenous antioxidant systems, and improve cellular stress resilience. However, much of this mechanistic evidence is derived from animal and experimental models, and its direct translation to humans remains uncertain. Human studies, including Ramadan cohorts and small interventional trials, report modest changes in commonly used oxidative stress biomarkers such as malondialdehyde (MDA) and F₂-isoprostanes. Nevertheless, these markers are non-specific, subject to methodological variability, and do not fully reflect tissue-level redox dynamics or clinically meaningful outcomes. Overall, human evidence remains limited, heterogeneous, and largely based on short-term studies, with a lack of long-term randomized controlled trials evaluating clinically relevant endpoints. While IF shows biologically plausible effects on oxidative stress, its clinical significance remains uncertain. Further well-designed, long-duration trials with standardized and comprehensive redox assessments are required to clarify its translational relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42377613What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.