ReviewBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026
Mechanics and mechanobiology of arterial development.
Review in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arteries serve primarily a biomechanical function. Critical insight into arterial structure, properties, and function thus derives from knowledge of mechanosensitive gene expression, associated microstructural organization, and biomechanical metrics such as compliance and vasoactive capacity. This review focuses on time-course changes in hemodynamic loads and associated changes in the transcriptional profile, mural composition, overall geometry, and mechanical properties of arteries during postnatal development, namely, from birth to a healthy adult. Although we examine the postnatal period, we allude to key findings during the prenatal period; although we draw on findings from multiple species and vessels, most data come from studies of the thoracic aorta in mice as an archetype vessel; and although we focus on normal development, we highlight four pathologic cases in which emergent homeostasis is compromised. Collectively, the data suggest that tissue-level mechanical homeostasis typically emerges following postnatal growth, with set-point values for multiple metrics dictating subsequent adaptations to changing hemodynamic loads in maturity, though with congenital defects, pathogenic variants, and disease conditions compromising homeostatic processes. Understanding the normal developmental program is essential for studying early-onset conditions, early surgical and pharmacological intervention, and ultimately aging as well as disease progression and its treatment in maturity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.