ArticleBMJ open2026
Consensus on the definition of locoregional recurrence of colon cancer: protocol for an international Delphi study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCancer recurrence is a pivotal outcome after treatment with curative intent for colon cancer patients, as it is related to worse survival, the subsequent need for further treatment and the associated use of healthcare resources. However, at present there is no consensus regarding the definition of locoregional recurrence of colon cancer. This contributes to variability in reporting outcomes and clinical management, limiting comparability across registries and clinical studies. This study aims to establish a consensus definition of locoregional recurrence using the Delphi method. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a worldwide Delphi consensus study among international experts involved in the treatment of colon cancer and recurrence (surgeons, medical oncologists, radiologists and pathologists). Conceptual elements of the survey were identified through literature exploration and concern: (i) anatomical locations, (ii) diagnostic criteria, (iii) resection margins and (iv) disease-free interval. Participants will be asked to rate their agreement on statements regarding the definition of locoregional recurrence of colon cancer. After the first round, we will analyse the data to determine which items have reached consensus for inclusion/exclusion and develop a second survey including items that did not reach consensus and any new items suggested by participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study, as it does not involve patient participation. Participation is restricted to clinical health professionals. Results will be disseminated via communication to relevant societies in this field, presentations on (inter)national meetings and peer-reviewed publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.