Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42379800›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Clinical Evaluation of a Magnesium-based Barrier Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Thomas Franke, Moritz Kollbach, Mike Barbeck, Tadas Korzinskas

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas FrankeDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Sciences, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Moritz KollbachDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Sciences, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Mike BarbeckClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venerology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany; mike.barbeck@med.uni-rostock.de.
Tadas KorzinskasDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Sciences, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimResorbable magnesium (Mg) membranes have been introduced for guided bone regeneration (GBR) to provide space maintenance without removal surgery. This prospective observational study evaluated clinical outcomes and postoperative events after GBR using a Mg membrane (NOVAMag PATIENTS AND

methodsIn a single-center cohort, 126 patients underwent 195 GBR-related procedures using a pure Mg membrane with optional Mg fixation screws. Follow-ups were performed up to three months. Outcomes included treatment success, wound dehiscence, clinically evident gas accumulation, and patient-reported recovery (pain/swelling duration).

resultsTreatment success was 94.9%. Gas accumulation occurred in 6.2% overall. Wound dehiscence occurred in 10.5%. Mean pain and swelling duration were 4.6 and 4.5 days (median 3 days each).

conclusionNOVAMag

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationGuided Tissue RegenerationMagnesiumMembranes, ArtificialAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeMagnesiumMembranes, Artificialclinical outcomesGuided bone regeneration (GBR)magnesium membraneresorbable barrier membranewound healing complications

Identifiers

PMID42379800
PMCPMC13322041

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.