Evidence mapPaperPMID 42380066Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Junyoung Park, Neo Kok, Irina Gaynanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junyoung ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2305-4986
Neo KokDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Irina GaynanovaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4116-0268

Funding

New machine learning methods for extracting features from digital health data with applications to sleep apneaR01HL172785 · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 2025 to 2025
$358k
NIH HHS R01HL172785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable devices, such as actigraphy monitors and continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), capture high-frequency data, which are often summarized by the percentages of time spent within fixed thresholds. For example, actigraphy data are categorized into sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous activity, while CGM data are divided into hypoglycemia, normoglycemia, and hyperglycemia based on a standard glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL. Although scientific and clinical guidelines inform the choice of thresholds, it remains unclear whether this choice is optimal and whether the same thresholds should be applied across different populations. In this work, we define threshold optimality with loss functions that quantify discrepancies between the full empirical distributions of wearable device measurements and their discretizations based on specific thresholds. We introduce two loss functions: one that aims to accurately reconstruct the original distributions and another that preserves the pairwise sample distances. Using the Wasserstein distance as the base measure, we reformulate the loss minimization as optimal piecewise linearization of quantile functions. We solve this optimization via stepwise algorithms and differential evolution. We also formulate semi-supervised approaches where some thresholds are predefined based on scientific rationale. Applications to CGM datasets from diverse populations, including individuals with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and normal glycemic control, demonstrate that data-driven thresholds vary by population, improve discriminative power, and yield stronger associations with clinical variables over fixed thresholds.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesActigraphyAlgorithmsBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringContinuous Glucose MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansLinear ModelsBlood Glucoseamalgamationcontinuous glucose monitoring (CGM)histogramtime‐in‐range (TIR)Wasserstein distance

Identifiers

PMID42380066
PMCPMC13318854

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.