Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Letter to the Editor: The Effects of Throat Packing and Gender on Post Operative Nausea, Vomiting, and Sore Throat in Septorhinoplasty Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have reviewed the article "The effects of throat packing and Gender on post operative nausea, vomiting , and sore throat in Septorhinoplasty patients- a randomized controlled trial " by Tankut Uzun et al. [1] with great interest. This article was exceptionally well written, delightful to read, and gave a valuable contribution to the field of aesthetic plastic surgery. We concur with the article's concluding statement that the routine use of throat packing is not recommended in elective septorhinoplasty as it did not reduce PONV and increase postoperative throat pain. However, we believe that the authors have drawn a few flaws, especially in methodology design, which significantly raise concerns about the validity, generalizability, and reliability of the study.No Level Assigned This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42380317What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.