ReviewEye (London, England)2026
Spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS): expert consensus on diagnosis and management.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) is a disorder primarily characterised by changes in the eye and optic nerve, but changes in brain features are also noted after spaceflight. SANS is caused by exposure to prolonged microgravity and at least one feature of SANS has been reported in 81% of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) astronauts. Early clinical features of SANS are observed in almost all individuals undergoing spaceflight, with the condition exacerbated by the duration of spaceflight. Knowledge of the features of SANS and the aetiology has rapidly grown since its first description in 2011. As international space agencies plan exploration beyond low Earth orbit and with the expansion of the commercial space sector, a publicly available consensus guide on diagnosis and potential management would be instructive to flight surgeons who manage SANS. Harmonising case identification will not only enhance clinical management but is also vital to set a framework for research into SANS. Here we collate and interpret the up-to-date phenotyping and clinical insight in SANS, with expertise from the leading SANS experts at NASA. A consensus on diagnosis and management with countermeasures is detailed. Space exploration is a rapidly evolving field and consequently, insights into SANS will undoubtedly grow and allow us to further refine our understanding of this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.