ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Slow-flow, high-impact: radiologic features in venous malformations of the female genital tract.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynaecological venous malformations are rare, congenital slow-flow vascular anomalies arising from early developmental errors. They may occur as isolated lesions or within syndromic contexts (associated with somatic gene variants such as PIK3CA and TEK). They remain poorly documented and frequently misclassified due to persistent outdated terminology and diagnostic challenges-requiring integration of clinical, radiological, and histopathological data. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis of gynaecological venous malformations: ultrasound serves as the first-line imaging modality, while Magnetic Resonance Imaging offers superior anatomical detail, confirms the diagnosis, and guides treatment planning and follow-up. However, the lack of standardised protocols and consensual imaging features complicates differentiation from other gynaecological vascular conditions with overlapping radiological appearances. Given diagnostic challenges and concerns regarding fertility, a multidisciplinary approach in specialised vascular anomaly centres combining clinical, radiological, histological, and genetic data is essential. This review aims to provide a complete sonographic and MRI framework aligned with current nomenclature, with key clinical and histopathological insights to support radiologists in their diagnostic process. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Gynaecological venous malformations are frequently overlooked or misdiagnosed due to shared imaging features and a lack of standardised protocols, making accurate imaging description and multidisciplinary assessment essential for a positive diagnosis and appropriate management in dedicated centres. KEY POINTS: Gynaecological venous malformations are rare and often misdiagnosed congenital anomalies. Diagnostic features include an organ enlargement with a sponge-like appearance and slow-flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.