ArticleNature medicine2026
Multi-antigen-targeting T cells in pediatric central nervous system tumors: a phase 1 trial.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the deadliest cancers in children, highlighting the need for new therapies. The tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) WT1, PRAME and survivin are widely expressed by these tumors, and a manufacturing technique has been developed to target these intracellular TAAs using autologous, nongenetically engineered T cells. Here we therefore conducted ReMIND, an open-label, phase 1 adaptive dose-finding study to determine the safety/feasibility of autologous, systemically administered trivalent T cells targeting WT1, PRAME and survivin in children with CNS tumors. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma without lymphodepletion (arm A, n = 16 enrolled, n = 11 infused) and relapsed/recurrent nonbrainstem CNS malignancies without (arm B, n = 28 enrolled, n = 18 infused) or with (arm C, n = 7 enrolled, n = 4 infused) lymphodepletion. Primary end points were safety, feasibility and maximum tolerated dose determination; secondary end points included preliminary efficacy and immunobiological correlates, including in vivo TAA-T persistence and systemic immune activation. Dose level 3 (8 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.