Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380710›Full record

ArticleOdontology2026

Effects of phytic and tannic acids on dentin bonding, nanoleakage, and micropermeability under wet and dry bonding techniques.

Francisco Adeilson Alves de Macedo, Marcelo Victor Sidou Lemos, Talita Arrais Daniel Mendes, Tainah Oliveira Rifane, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa, Vicente de Paulo Aragão Saboia, Sérgio Lima Santiago

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francisco Adeilson Alves de MacedoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4343-0418
Marcelo Victor Sidou LemosGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2993-534X
Talita Arrais Daniel MendesGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-3618
Tainah Oliveira RifaneGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-1672
Victor Pinheiro FeitosaCollege of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8795-9967
Vicente de Paulo Aragão SaboiaGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1143-6390
Sérgio Lima SantiagoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. sergiosantiago@ufc.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6808-092X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acid-conditioned dentin may contain exposed collagen fibrils that are vulnerable to hydrolytic degradation when resin infiltration is incomplete. Thus, alternative acidic conditioners with dentin-biomodifying potential may help improve resin-dentin interface stability. This study investigated the effects of dentin biomodification with phytic acid (IP6), tannic acid (TA), and glutaraldehyde (GLU) on resin-dentin bonding performance under dry and wet conditions. Seventy-two extracted human molars were assigned to eight groups according to the dentin conditioning agent and bonding protocol: 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s (Control), 5% GLU for 30 s, 1% IP6 (pH 1.2) for 30 s, and 20% TA (pH 2.8) for 30 s, applied under dry or wet dentin conditions. Adper™ Single Bond 2 was applied, and resin-dentin specimens were prepared for microtensile bond strength testing (µTBS; n = 6), nanoleakage analysis (NL; n = 1), and micropermeability evaluation (MP; n = 2). Half of the specimens were tested after 24 h and the remaining half after 6 months of water storage. NL was assessed by SEM/EDS, MP by confocal laser scanning microscopy, and µTBS data by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). TA showed significantly lower µTBS values than the Control and GLU groups under both bonding conditions and at both periods (p < 0.001). Compared with IP6, TA exhibited lower µTBS in all conditions, except under wet bonding at 24 h, where no significant difference was observed (p > 0.05). No significant reduction in µTBS after 6 months was observed for the Control, GLU, and IP6 groups (p > 0.05). Under dry bonding, IP6 reduced silver nitrate deposition, whereas TA showed greater silver uptake. Under wet bonding, IP6 showed increased interfacial infiltration, while TA displayed reduced NL despite lower bond strength. MP analysis revealed reduced fluorescein penetration and improved sealing for IP6- and TA-treated dentin. The highest µTBS values occurred in the IP6 Dry 24 h group. IP6 showed the most favorable overall performance, maintaining bond strength over time while reducing NL and improving sealing.

Indexed as

Dentin-bonding agentsDentin permeabilityPhytic acidTannic acid

Identifiers

PMID42380710

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.