Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380910›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Predicting abnormal birth weight and identifying associated factors using machine learning in the Hararghe Health and Demographic Surveillance System, Ethiopia.

Sington Abdeta, Ousmane Diop, Steve Cygu, Aboubacry Drame, Reinpeter Momanyi, Belayneh Endalamaw Dejene, Mulugeta Tadele, Yordanos Sintayehu, Miranda Barasa, Mirkuzie Woldie and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sington AbdetaCollege of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia. singtonabdeta128@gmail.com.
Ousmane DiopThe Institute for Health Research, Epidemiological Surveillance and Training (IRESSEF), Dakar, Senegal.
Steve CyguAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Aboubacry DrameMinistry of Health, Dakar, Senegal.
Reinpeter MomanyiAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Belayneh Endalamaw DejeneUniversity of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Mulugeta TadeleArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yordanos SintayehuArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Miranda BarasaAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Mirkuzie WoldieFenot Associates, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tsinuel GirmaFenot Associates, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Rosa TsegayeArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Agnes KiraggaAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Bethlehem AdnewArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Rawleigh HoweArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Merga Dheresa *College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Alemseged Abdisa *Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBirth weight is a reliable indicator of intrauterine growth and an important predictor of neonatal survival, growth, and long-term development. Globally, approximately 15.5% of live births are low birth weight, and nearly 10% are macrosomic (high birth weight), with a substantial proportion of these cases occurring in sub-Saharan Africa. Birth weights outside the normal range of 2,500-4,000 g are considered abnormal and are associated with increased risks of neonatal and maternal complications. Ethiopia is similarly affected by the growing burden of abnormal birth weight.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study design using secondary HDSS data collected from 2015 to 2022 was employed. This design was considered appropriate because the study aimed to develop machine learning models using routinely collected surveillance data to predict abnormal birth weight and identify associated factors, rather than to establish causal relationships. All singleton births were included, and those with missing birth weight data were excluded. Six machine learning algorithms identified from the literature were built and compared to identify the best-performing model for predicting abnormal birth weight. Prior observational studies and expert opinion were used to select the candidate features for all models. The synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was used to manage the imbalance in the dataset. The dataset was split into training (80%, n = 9,242) and testing (20%, n = 2,311) subsets for model development and evaluation. Hyper-parametric tuning was performed using grid search combined with 10-fold cross-validation to optimize model performance and reduce over-fitting. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, F1-score, and Kappa. Feature importance analysis was done using Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP) values.

resultsThe Descriptive analysis of 11,553 singleton births showed that 10.78% of the newborns had high birth weight (HBW) and 9.28% had low birth weight (LBW). The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model performed best by achieving an AUC of 0.835, an accuracy of 0.72, a precision of 0.67, an F1-score of 0.63, a recall of 0.54, and a kappa of 0.52 for abnormal birth weight prediction. The feature importance analysis showed that the top predictors for the low birth weight (LBW) include maternal educational status, age at first delivery, and antenatal care (ANC) visit, while high birth weight (HBW) was strongly predicted by antenatal care (ANC) visit, maternal literacy status, age at first delivery, and maternal education.

conclusionMachine learning models showed moderate performance in predicting abnormal birth weight using HDSS surveillance data. Maternal educational characteristics, age at first delivery, and ANC utilization were identified as important predictive features. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because the model identified predictive associations rather than causal relationships. Further studies incorporating additional maternal clinical and nutritional variables, as well as external validation datasets, are recommended to improve predictive performance and generalizability.

Indexed as

Birth WeightMachine LearningPopulation SurveillanceAdultClassification AlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAbnormal birth weightAssociated factorsEthiopiaHararghe HDSSMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID42380910
PMCPMC13587436

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.