Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380911›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Ankle-foot orthosis mechanical testing: a scoping review.

Katherine Vaiciulis, Zachary Williston, Deema Totah

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine VaiciulisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Iowa, 3131 Seamans Center, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. katherine-vaiciulis@uiowa.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2549-1938
Zachary WillistonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Iowa, 3131 Seamans Center, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Deema TotahDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Iowa, 3131 Seamans Center, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9258-7256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnkle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are assistive devices that support the ankle during gait. AFO mechanical properties, such as rotational stiffness about the ankle, influence the level of support these devices provide. Interest in quantifying AFO mechanical properties is on the rise but is limited by the lack of standardized measurement and assessment techniques. This scoping review discusses existing techniques for the measurement of AFO mechanical properties and introduces a taxonomy for organizing and describing these methods.

methodsA scoping review was conducted using a snowballing approach starting from two previously published literature reviews and a database search using PubMed, Engineering Village (Compendex), and Web of Science. Articles with methods that experimentally measured the mechanical properties of AFOs were eligible for inclusion. Data extracted from the selected articles included operation specifications, planes/joints tested, and presence of a biological or surrogate limb during AFO testing. DISCUSSION: The majority of methods utilize benchtop AFO testing, with a few in-situ methods that involve a biological limb. We highlight key design challenges related to replicating biological gait, including bending axis location and design, motion in single versus multiple planes, and limited testing speeds and range of motion.

conclusionWe introduced a taxonomy for describing AFO testing methods to facilitate cross-device comparisons and inform future development. Future work should include developing standardized, biomimetic methods and validation techniques for testing a variety of AFO designs. This would enable more accurate AFO measurement and enable cross-study comparisons, ultimately leading to optimized AFO properties and improved user performance outcomes.

Indexed as

AnkleFoot OrthosesBiomechanical PhenomenaEquipment DesignGaitHumansAFOAnkle-foot orthosisComplianceMechanical testingResistanceRigidityStiffness

Identifiers

PMID42380911
PMCPMC13587519

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.