Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2026
3D CT-Based quantification of airway structural changes during asthma exacerbations: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditionally, mucus plugs have been evaluated using two-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images through expert visual assessment, a process that requires substantial experience and specialized knowledge of airway anatomy. In the present study, we propose a novel approach employing three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) with semi-automated quantification, which can be performed in routine clinical practice without requiring expert readers. We aimed to demonstrate its feasibility and clinical relevance for assessing mucus plug burden and exacerbation severity in asthma.
methodsThis exploratory, single-center, retrospective study included 23 patients with asthma and a history of exacerbations. Using a clinically available 3D-CT application, we semi-automatically quantified bronchial endpoint count and bronchial volume in both stable and exacerbation phases, and calculated their percentage change. We further assessed correlations of these parameters with mucus plug scores and arterial blood gas measurements.
resultsThe bronchial endpoint count and bronchial volume were significantly lower during exacerbations than during the stable phase; both showed a significant negative correlation with mucus plug scores during exacerbations. The percentage change of bronchial endpoint count and bronchial volume from the stable to exacerbation phase also correlated with mucus plug scores. The bronchial endpoint count and bronchial volume at exacerbation-related admission did not correlate with the PaO
conclusionsClinically available semi-automated 3D-CT analysis enables objective and reproducible quantification of bronchial endpoint count and bronchial volume during asthma exacerbations, eliminating the need for expert readers. Their percentage change from the stable to exacerbation phase not only reflect mucus plug burden but also correlate with oxygenation status. These imaging biomarkers enable objective and quantitative assessment of structural airway abnormalities, including airway narrowing, distal airway obstruction, and mucus impaction. They are not intended to replace conventional clinical or physiological assessment, but rather to provide complementary structural information regarding the underlying causes of physiological abnormalities, such as impaired oxygenation, when detected by physiological evaluation. Furthermore, such quantitative structural assessment may contribute to a better understanding of airway structural changes and airway dynamics during asthma exacerbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.