ReviewBMC global and public health2026
Sitting still while the world gets sicker: Rethinking physical inactivity as a public health emergency.
Review in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical inactivity (PI) has emerged as a "forgotten pandemic" in global health. Over a quarter of adults worldwide fail to meet recommended physical activity (PA) levels, a proportion that has remained largely unchanged since 2001. This inactivity drives a rising non-communicable disease burden, deepens health inequities, and generates substantial economic costs. Yet preventive action and dedicated funding remain insufficient. Despite international frameworks and national PA plans, with nearly 75% of countries reporting relevant policies, implementation remains inconsistent and population-wide impact elusive. Global efforts are constrained by systemic policy blind spots. Health in All Policies, a governance approach that integrates health considerations into policy decisions across sectors such as urban planning and education, remains widely endorsed but rarely enacted, foreclosing opportunities for action. Viewed through an equity lens, existing strategies disproportionately benefit more advantaged populations, leaving underserved groups behind. These shortcomings are compounded by short political cycles and chronic underinvestment in prevention, which prioritize short-term political wins over long-term gains. A fundamental paradigm shift is required, from fragmented, individually focused initiatives towards a multilevel, systems-based approach that aligns global, national, and local action. PA must be reframed as a societal investment, rather than a lifestyle choice contingent on individual responsibility. Genuine population-level empowerment stems not from placing the burden on individuals, but from creating environments and policies that enable active living. We call on global health leaders to elevate PA promotion to the forefront of political agendas, supported by increased funding, long-term vision, rigorous implementation, and targeted interventions for underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.