Evidence mapPaperPMID 42381035Full record

ReviewBMC global and public health2026

Sitting still while the world gets sicker: Rethinking physical inactivity as a public health emergency.

Kim Daniels, Kirsten Quadflieg, Jochen Bergs, Annemie Spooren, Dominique Hansen, Bruno Bonnechère

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kim DanielsREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 7, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium. kim.daniels@uhasselt.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-4518
Kirsten QuadfliegREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 7, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
Jochen BergsTHINK3 Simulation & Innovation Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
Annemie SpoorenREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 7, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
Dominique HansenREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 7, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
Bruno BonnechèreREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 7, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity (PI) has emerged as a "forgotten pandemic" in global health. Over a quarter of adults worldwide fail to meet recommended physical activity (PA) levels, a proportion that has remained largely unchanged since 2001. This inactivity drives a rising non-communicable disease burden, deepens health inequities, and generates substantial economic costs. Yet preventive action and dedicated funding remain insufficient. Despite international frameworks and national PA plans, with nearly 75% of countries reporting relevant policies, implementation remains inconsistent and population-wide impact elusive. Global efforts are constrained by systemic policy blind spots. Health in All Policies, a governance approach that integrates health considerations into policy decisions across sectors such as urban planning and education, remains widely endorsed but rarely enacted, foreclosing opportunities for action. Viewed through an equity lens, existing strategies disproportionately benefit more advantaged populations, leaving underserved groups behind. These shortcomings are compounded by short political cycles and chronic underinvestment in prevention, which prioritize short-term political wins over long-term gains. A fundamental paradigm shift is required, from fragmented, individually focused initiatives towards a multilevel, systems-based approach that aligns global, national, and local action. PA must be reframed as a societal investment, rather than a lifestyle choice contingent on individual responsibility. Genuine population-level empowerment stems not from placing the burden on individuals, but from creating environments and policies that enable active living. We call on global health leaders to elevate PA promotion to the forefront of political agendas, supported by increased funding, long-term vision, rigorous implementation, and targeted interventions for underserved populations.

Indexed as

Digital InnovationGlobal healthHealth policyPhysical activityPhysical inactivityPolicy gapsPreventionPublic health

Identifiers

PMID42381035
PMCPMC13321891

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.