ArticleBMC oral health2026
Intrapulpal thermal variation in standalone and dentifrice-assisted laser desensitisation at two time intervals.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDentin hypersensitivity (DH) affects a significant number of patients. Various therapeutic options have been devised to alleviate pain, including lasers, for achieving dentinal tubule occlusion. This research aimed to compare the intrapulpal temperature rise during a laser irradiation procedure for desensitisation, using laser alone and laser in combination with a dentifrice.
methodNineteen molar tooth samples were taken, which were sectioned 2 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Intrapulpal temperature changes were recorded using a K-type thermocouple, which was connected to a multiplexer and data logger for real-time temperature measurement at time intervals of 15 and 30 s, under stimulated pulpal microcirculation. Experiment protocols were categorised based on whether the laser was used alone (control group) or in conjunction with the dentifrice. They were further divided into two subgroups based on the duration of laser irradiation, utilising a diode laser (940 nm wavelength, 1 W power, defocused mode). The collected data were analysed to compare intrapulpal temperature changes between laser alone and laser combined with dentifrice application at both time intervals.
resultsAll the analysis was done using SPSS 26. There was a significant main effect of duration (p < 0.001), indicating a substantial change between 15 and 30 s. A significant main effect of laser irradiation was also observed (p < 0.001), suggesting a large difference between the laser irradiation with or without dentifrice. No significant interaction was seen between duration and laser irradiation (p = 0.062).
conclusionThe use of dentifrice in conjunction with laser irradiation resulted in less temperature rise compared to laser irradiation alone. However, exposure duration played a critical role in determining temperature variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.