ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Risk prediction of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: development, validation of a machine learning model with multicenter data.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) is a common and severe complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, with high incidence and mortality. Conventional diagnostic indicators, such as serum creatinine and urine output, have limitations in early identification. Existing machine learning (ML)-based prediction models are mostly single-center and lack interpretability, highlighting the clinical need for reliable and applicable early prediction tools.
methodsData were collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV), eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD), and Bobai County People's Hospital ICU (BB-ICU). Eligible patients were those meeting the Sepsis-3.0 criteria, with SA-AKI as the primary outcome. Ten core variables were selected from 83 indicators measured within 24 h of ICU admission through a four-step screening process. Six ML algorithms were optimized using grid search and five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The optimal model was interpreted via SHAP, externally validated, and translated into a web-based calculator using the Shiny framework.
resultsThe incidence of SA-AKI was 45.1% in MIMIC-IV, 28.1% in eICU-CRD, and 34.1% in BB-ICU. The XGBoost model performed best, with an internal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 and external validation AUCs of 0.82 (eICU-CRD) and 0.84 (BB-ICU). The XGBoost model also showed balanced classification metrics (sensitivity 0.73, specificity 0.60), a calibration curve close to the diagonal, and the highest net benefit in DCA. SHAP analysis identified partial thromboplastin time (PTT), creatinine, 24-hour urine output, and SAPSII as the key predictive factors.
conclusionsThe ML model developed in this study demonstrates good discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical applicability. SHAP improves the model's interpretability, and the web-based tool supports early SA-AKI risk stratification. This study provides a technical basis for addressing the clinical challenge of early SA-AKI prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.