Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381925›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

Microbiome differential abundance methodologies to detect relevant taxa associated with chemotherapy toxicity rate in colorectal cancer.

Elsa Martín-De Arribas, Kelly Conde-Pérez, Pablo Aja-Macaya, Juan A Vallejo, Germán Bou, Ana López-Cheda, María Amalia Jácome-Pumar, Susana Ladra, Margarita Poza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elsa Martín-De ArribasUniversidade da Coruña, CITIC, Database Laboratory, A Coruña, 15071, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-5440
Kelly Conde-PérezMicrobiology Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research (INIBIC), Interdisciplinary Center for Chemistry and Biology (CICA)-University of A Coruña (UDC)-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC-ISCIII), A Coruña, 15006, Spain.
Pablo Aja-MacayaMicrobiology Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research (INIBIC), Interdisciplinary Center for Chemistry and Biology (CICA)-University of A Coruña (UDC)-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC-ISCIII), A Coruña, 15006, Spain.
Juan A VallejoMicrobiology Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research (INIBIC), Interdisciplinary Center for Chemistry and Biology (CICA)-University of A Coruña (UDC)-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC-ISCIII), A Coruña, 15006, Spain.
Germán BouMicrobiology Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research (INIBIC), Interdisciplinary Center for Chemistry and Biology (CICA)-University of A Coruña (UDC)-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC-ISCIII), A Coruña, 15006, Spain.
Ana López-ChedaUniversidade da Coruña, CITIC, Grupo de Modelización, Optimización e Inferencia Estatística (MODES), Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultade de Informática, A Coruña, 15071, Spain.
María Amalia Jácome-PumarUniversidade da Coruña, CITIC, Grupo de Modelización, Optimización e Inferencia Estatística (MODES), Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultade de Informática, A Coruña, 15071, Spain.
Susana LadraUniversidade da Coruña, CITIC, Database Laboratory, A Coruña, 15071, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4616-0774
Margarita PozaMicrobiology Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research (INIBIC), Interdisciplinary Center for Chemistry and Biology (CICA)-University of A Coruña (UDC)-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC-ISCIII), A Coruña, 15006, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9423-7268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: The interplay between microbial communities and treatment outcomes represents a promising area in pharmacomicrobiomics. Identifying microbial biomarkers that differentiate toxicity levels could inform personalized cancer strategies. However, biomarker identification is strongly influenced by methodological choices in differential abundance analysis (DAA), and most studies focus on individual outcomes despite toxicity being inherently multifactorial. In this study, we defined a multi-dimensional toxicity variable integrating clinical symptoms and treatment modifications to stratify colorectal cancer patients. We then evaluated six widely used DAA methods (ALDEx2, ANCOM-BC, DESeq2, LEfSe, LinDA, and ZicoSeq) to assess how analytical variability affects the detection of microbiome signatures associated with chemotherapy-related toxicity. Analyses were performed under different preprocessing and multiple-testing correction strategies, and consistency was further examined using an independent validation dataset. Results: Substantial variability was observed across methods, with limited overlap in detected taxa but moderate concordance in effect-size rankings. ANCOM-BC showed the most consistent overall performance across analytical scenarios, although trade-offs remained between taxa detection, ranking, and direction of association. Despite this variability, a subset of taxa was consistently identified across methods, including Availability and implementation: The data supporting this study are available at NCBI SRA database (PRJNA911189) and NCBI SRA database (PRJNA893853).

Identifiers

PMID42381925
PMCPMC13317941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.