Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381987›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Generative AI for pre-consultation mental health triage in disorders of gut-brain interaction.

Dakai Zeng, He Zeng, Jie Song, Kai Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dakai ZengThird Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
He ZengThird Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jie SongThird Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Kai ZhuRuian Fifth People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are common, disabling, and frequently accompanied by anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, symptom-related fear, and repeated health care use. In routine gastroenterology practice, these problems are often recognized late, after fragmented histories, multiple visits, and avoidable investigations. Recent work on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and conversational systems suggests a narrower and more practical clinical use case than autonomous diagnosis: supervised pre-consultation triage. We propose that DGBI is a suitable setting for this approach because triage depends on integrating symptom narratives, prior investigations, alarm features, and psychosocial context rather than on a single test result. A GenAI-enabled intake tool could summarize patient-entered histories, incorporate brief distress screening and symptom diaries, flag possible medical or psychiatric escalation, and help route patients toward standard gastroenterology review, integrated psychogastroenterology, dietetic input, or urgent assessment. Its value would lie in making the first consultation more efficient and more clinically informed, not in replacing specialist judgment. For such systems to be acceptable, five conditions are essential: a narrowly defined triage task, multidomain but proportionate data collection, explicit rules for medical and psychiatric escalation, clinician review before action, and prospective evaluation across workflow, safety, equity, and patient acceptability. DGBI offers a realistic opportunity to develop GenAI tools that are useful precisely because they are constrained, auditable, and embedded in multidisciplinary care.

Indexed as

disorders of gut-brain interactiongenerative AImental healthmultidomain assessmentpre-consultation triagepsychogastroenterology

Identifiers

PMID42381987
PMCPMC13314926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.