ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Generative AI for pre-consultation mental health triage in disorders of gut-brain interaction.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are common, disabling, and frequently accompanied by anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, symptom-related fear, and repeated health care use. In routine gastroenterology practice, these problems are often recognized late, after fragmented histories, multiple visits, and avoidable investigations. Recent work on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and conversational systems suggests a narrower and more practical clinical use case than autonomous diagnosis: supervised pre-consultation triage. We propose that DGBI is a suitable setting for this approach because triage depends on integrating symptom narratives, prior investigations, alarm features, and psychosocial context rather than on a single test result. A GenAI-enabled intake tool could summarize patient-entered histories, incorporate brief distress screening and symptom diaries, flag possible medical or psychiatric escalation, and help route patients toward standard gastroenterology review, integrated psychogastroenterology, dietetic input, or urgent assessment. Its value would lie in making the first consultation more efficient and more clinically informed, not in replacing specialist judgment. For such systems to be acceptable, five conditions are essential: a narrowly defined triage task, multidomain but proportionate data collection, explicit rules for medical and psychiatric escalation, clinician review before action, and prospective evaluation across workflow, safety, equity, and patient acceptability. DGBI offers a realistic opportunity to develop GenAI tools that are useful precisely because they are constrained, auditable, and embedded in multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.