ArticleMedical review (2021)2026
Endogenous jaw bone regeneration: past, present, and future.
Article in Medical review (2021), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Jaw bone defects impair oral function and facial aesthetics, reducing patients' quality of life. While significant progress has been achieved in systemic skeletal repair, jaw bone regeneration remains challenging due to its distinct biological and anatomical features compared with long bones. This article systematically traces the evolution of jaw bone regeneration from conventional guided bone regeneration to bioactive scaffold-based tissue engineering. Mechanism-driven strategies tailored for jaw bone regeneration under compromised bone microenvironment are also discussed, with a specific focus on diabetes. A clear understanding of the evolution of strategies for jaw bone regeneration and the challenges posed by impaired bone microenvironment will foster innovation in this field and improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.