ArticleMedical review (2021)2026
Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.
Article in Medical review (2021), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe trauma continues to rank among the leading causes of mortality and permanent disability globally, posing an intractable public health challenge that mandates prompt sophisticated and multidisciplinary intervention. Notably, the "Chinese model" has evolved into a transformative paradigm designed to optimize the efficiency of prehospital and in-hospital trauma rescue systems. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of paradigm-shifting advances in the management of severe trauma. We systematically scrutinize the latest clinical and translational evidence underpinning life-saving resuscitation strategies, with a particular focus on the paradigm shift from aggressive crystalloid-based resuscitation to hemostatic damage control resuscitation Furthermore, we delve into innovations in core damage control techniques encompassing hemorrhage control, decompression of compartment syndromes, skeletal stabilization, and surgical source control of contamination. We also evaluate the revolutionary impact of information technology and artificial intelligence on streamlining trauma care workflows, from prehospital triage to postdischarge follow-up. Additionally, through a cross-country comparison of trauma system configurations, we address the pivotal role of standardized quality control metrics and centralized trauma registries in mitigating regional disparities in trauma care outcomes. By synthesizing these cutting-edge developments, this review endeavors to explore future directions for the construction of a more resilient and intelligent high-performance trauma care system. Looking ahead, the integration of advanced technologies, personalized medicine, and cross-border collaboration holds promise for further enhancing trauma care efficiency and equity, ensuring that trauma systems evolve to meet the challenges of increasingly complex and dynamic healthcare environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.