ArticleCurrent research in structural biology2026
Nucleo-amino acid derived AMO as a potential JAK inhibitor: machine learning screening, docking, molecular dynamics, ADMET/toxicity, and MM-PBSA analysis.
Article in Current research in structural biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
L-amino acids and nucleotide bases are essential biomolecules in all living organisms and represent attractive building blocks for designing safer, more effective drugs. In this study, we designed JAK kinase inhibitor candidates derived from these natural compounds and evaluated them using an integrated computational workflow. MarvinSketch was used to generate 100 structures, which were optimized in Spartan; frequency calculations confirmed the absence of imaginary modes and enabled calculation of key physicochemical properties. The candidates were then screened against five known JAK inhibitors using machine learning models (SVR, RF, KNN, and an ensemble approach), yielding (3S,5S)-5-((2-amino-6-oxo-1,6-dihydro-9H-purin-9-yl)methyl)-3-(4-aminobutyl)morpholin-2-one (AMO) as the top hit. Molecular docking identified favorable active-site interactions, and Abrocitinib (ABR) was selected as the closest comparator with the best overlay to AMO. Molecular dynamics simulations showed stable AMO binding, supported by RMSD/RMSF, radius of gyration, hydrogen-bonding, and DSSP analyses. PCA indicated a more compact conformational distribution for AMO than ABR, consistent with reduced large-scale motions, and DCCM supported favorable correlated dynamics. Pharmacokinetic profiling and ProTox-3.0 toxicity predictions classified both compounds as class 4, but AMO exhibited substantially lower predicted toxicity than ABR. Finally, MM-PBSA calculations yielded negative binding energies, confirming that the AMO-protein interaction is thermodynamically favorable and strong.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.