Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382803›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

The influence of different raw material processing methods on the quality of mulberry fruit wine.

Yuanxia Wang, Tianhang Wang, Sixian Tan, Xiaocui Liu, Yu Rao, Dejian Huang, Ping Xie, Pingkang Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuanxia WangSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China.
Tianhang WangSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China.
Sixian TanSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China.
Xiaocui LiuSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China.
Yu RaoSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China.
Dejian HuangDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, 2 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117542, Singapore.
Ping XieSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China.
Pingkang XuSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study systematically compared the quality attributes and volatile profiles of mulberry wine produced from mulberry pulp (MPW) and mulberry juice (MJW) throughout fermentation and subsequent storage. Yeast fermentation markedly enhanced antioxidant activity, achieving a 90% radical scavenging rate. The presence of pulp matrix facilitated higher retention of phenolics and anthocyanins. Sixty-three volatile compounds were identified, with MPW fermentation enriching flavor complexity and introducing herbaceous notes via stem retention. During storage, MPW exhibited slower degradation of phenolics and anthocyanins, maintaining higher bioactivity and stability. The volatile compounds decreased after 25 d, particularly alcohols and esters. These findings indicate that pulp-based fermentation is more effective at preserving bioactive compounds. This approach provides a practical strategy for industrial processing, serving as a viable method to extend shelf-life without exogenous additives and offering a strategic pathway for developing high-value fermented fruit products.

Indexed as

FermentationMulberryStorage periodVolatile flavor compoundsYeast

Identifiers

PMID42382803
PMCPMC13316759

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.