Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383032›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Multimodal data fusion of dual-modal DWI-ADC MRI and clinical variables for prognostic prediction in acute ischemic stroke.

Yanliang Ji, Xuewen Wo, Bo Yuan, Yaran Liu, Zhidong Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanliang JiShandong Key Lab of Complex Medical Intelligence and Aging, Shandong Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Yantai, China.
Xuewen WoDepartment of Neurology, Binzhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Binzhou, China.
Bo YuanInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Yaran LiuShandong Key Lab of Complex Medical Intelligence and Aging, Shandong Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Yantai, China.
Zhidong XueShandong Key Lab of Complex Medical Intelligence and Aging, Shandong Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Yantai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and internally evaluate a probability-level stacked ensemble model integrating diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based imaging predictions with routinely available clinical predictions to predict 90-day poor functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 562 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent DWI and ADC MRI within 1 to 7 days after symptom onset. Poor outcome was defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale >2. Patients were assigned at the patient level to training ( Results: In the held-out internal test set, the fusion model achieved the highest numerical AUC (0.951, 95% CI: 0.908-0.994), with sensitivity of 0.889 and specificity of 0.911. The DeLong test showed that the fusion model significantly outperformed the imaging model ( Conclusion: The fusion model showed high internal discrimination and improved performance compared with imaging alone, but its incremental value over clinical models was limited in calibration and decision curve analyses. External validation, recalibration, and prospective evaluation are required before broader clinical use.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokeclinical risk modelingdual-modal magnetic resonance imagingmultimodal fusionprognostic prediction

Identifiers

PMID42383032
PMCPMC13316786

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.