ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Evolving Trends and Perioperative Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: Results from the GRAND Study Register.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) remains a debilitating complication after treatment for prostate cancer or benign prostatic obstruction. While artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation is the gold standard, sling procedures are widely adopted for selected patients. We aimed to analyze long-term trends, perioperative outcomes, and explantation patterns of AUS and sling procedures for male SUI in Germany. Methods: We performed a population-based study using the German Nationwide Inpatient Sample (GRAND) from 2005 to 2023. Men undergoing AUS or sling implantation were identified through procedure codes. Primary outcomes were in-hospital morbidity, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). Multivariable regression models were adjusted for age, comorbidities, prior radiotherapy, and year of surgery. Reasons for explantation and reimplantation were also assessed. Key findings and limitations: A total of 24 234 men underwent SUI surgery (AUS: 63%, nonadjustable sling: 32%, and adjustable sling: 4.7%). Median age was 72 yr. AUS implantation remained most frequent, although it declined slightly in recent years. Use of nonadjustable sling peaked in 2012 but decreased thereafter, whereas use of adjustable sling procedures increased steadily. Procedure volumes markedly decreased during COVID-19. Perioperative mortality was <0.1% across groups. Nonadjustable slings were associated with a higher risk of acute urinary retention (odds ratio [OR]: 1.1, Conclusions and clinical implications: Male SUI surgery is safe, with AUS remaining the most frequent procedure in Germany. Adjustable slings represent an expanding option for selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.