Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383201›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2026

A diameter-adaptive, suture-free conduit with magnetoelectric responsiveness promotes peripheral nerve regeneration.

Bo Ma, Hailin Ma, Kangling Xu, Baixin Gu, Junyu Su, Fengshi Zhang, Lingxin Duan, Yichong Zhang, Fei Yu, Yuhui Kou

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bo MaDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Hailin MaDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Kangling XuShenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Baixin GuShenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Junyu SuShenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Fengshi ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Lingxin DuanShenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Yichong ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Fei YuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518035, China.
Yuhui KouDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair of peripheral nerve defects necessitates the use of nerve guidance conduits (NGCs). However, the diameter mismatch between NGC and nerve, the complex suturing process, and the slow rate of axonal growth collectively leads to unsatisfactory nerve regeneration. Therefore, an ideal NGC should be diameter-adaptive, suture-free, and capable of providing electrical signals to enhance nerve regeneration. Inspired by the

Indexed as

Diameter-adaptiveMagnetoelectric responsivenessNerve guidance conduitPeripheral nerve injurySuture-free

Identifiers

PMID42383201
PMCPMC13315961

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.