ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Multisource Machine Learning Model for Detecting Referral-Warranted Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a multisource machine learning model for detecting referral-warranted retinopathy of prematurity (RW-ROP) using retinal images and demographics. Design: Secondary analysis of data from the Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity Study. Subjects: One thousand two hundred fifty-seven premature infants (mean birth weight 864 g; mean gestational age 27 weeks; 19.4% with RW-ROP) enrolled from 12 clinical centers in North America. Methods: A multisource ROPNet (MS-ROPNet) model that combines a VGG-Swin Transformer model to extract features from retinal images and a random forest model that captures patterns of demographics was developed using central-view retinal images from 7741 eye visits with concurrent clinical eye examinations and demographic characteristics (birth weight, gestational age, sex, ethnicity, and age at retinal image). The MS-ROPnet model was compared to several existing machine learning models for detecting RW-ROP. Main Outcome Measures: Model performance metrics including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy from fivefold cross-validation, with RW-ROP diagnosed by certified ophthalmologists as the reference standard. Results: The MS-ROPNet achieved an AUROC of 95.0 ± 0.7% (mean ± standard deviation), AUPRC of 78.0 ± 2.8%, sensitivity of 81.5 ± 4.0%, specificity of 94.3 ± 1.4%, and accuracy of 93.0 ± 0.9% under the default cutoff of 0.50 in predicted probability. After adjusting the cutoff to achieve higher sensitivity, MS-ROPNet had 90% sensitivity and specificity of 84.8 ± 2.5% (using cutoff 0.3504), and 95% sensitivity with specificity of 72.8 ± 6.9% (using cutoff 0.2074), which outperformed both existing multisource models and the best single-source model by ≥3.7% in specificity at the same sensitivity. Conclusions: The MS-ROPNet achieved high performance in RW-ROP classification by effectively integrating retinal images with demographics, demonstrating its potential for accurate risk stratification of RW-ROP. Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.