ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Exosome-Biomaterial Platforms for Diabetic Skin Infections: Microenvironment Remodeling, Responsive Delivery, and Clinical Translation.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic skin infections, particularly diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), remain difficult to treat because infection, biofilm formation, persistent inflammation, oxidative stress, hypoxia, impaired angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix (ECM) disruption coexist within a hostile wound microenvironment. Conventional treatments, including antibiotics, surgical debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, and standard dressings, are indispensable but often fail to simultaneously suppress infection and restore regenerative healing. Exosomes have emerged as promising acellular mediators for diabetic wound repair because they can coordinate immune regulation, angiogenesis, matrix remodeling, and re-epithelialization. However, direct exosome administration is limited by rapid clearance, poor local retention, dilution by wound exudate, dose inconsistency, and manufacturing heterogeneity. Biomaterial platforms, including hydrogels, microneedle patches, membranes, cryogels, porous scaffolds, and responsive nanocomposite systems, provide a rational strategy to protect exosome bioactivity, prolong local retention, and enable sustained or stimulus-responsive release. More importantly, these materials can be engineered to actively regulate infection-associated pathological barriers, including biofilm persistence, excessive oxidative stress, hypoxia, and impaired tissue reconstruction. This review summarizes recent advances in exosome-biomaterial systems for diabetic skin infections, with emphasis on delivery design, microenvironment-responsive release, anti-infective and regenerative mechanisms, platform comparison, and clinical translation. We further discuss key translational challenges, including exosome source selection, dose standardization, potency assays, scalable manufacturing, storage stability, biosafety, regulatory classification, and clinical trial design. Current evidence suggests that exosome-biomaterial systems can improve wound closure, vascularization, collagen deposition, re-epithelialization, and infection control in preclinical models. Nevertheless, high-quality clinical evidence remains limited. Future studies should prioritize clinically relevant infected diabetic wound models, standardized quality-control frameworks, and simplified delivery systems compatible with routine wound care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.