ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Extracellular Vesicles for Therapeutic Applications: A Translational Framework Integrating Sources, Administration Routes, Indications, Quality Control, and Regulatory Systems.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoscale membranous vesicles that mediate intercellular communication via the transport of bioactive cargos. With context-dependent intrinsic targeting, source- and cargo-dependent favorable biocompatibility and loading capacity, EVs represent promising acellular therapeutic platforms with context-dependent translational potential. However, their clinical application is hindered by source-associated functional heterogeneity, unclear matching relationships between administration routes and disease indications, as well as imperfect quality control specifications and fragmented global regulatory frameworks alongside insufficient clinical trial data. This review systematically summarizes the biological features of EVs originating from mesenchymal stem cells, immune cells, tumor cells, plants, milk, microbes and platelets, and compares the pros and cons and applicable scenarios of intravenous, oral, nasal, inhaled, and multiple local injection delivery modalities. We further recapitulate the research progress of EV therapeutics across regenerative medicine, immunotherapy, oncology, neurological and metabolic disorders, and analyze worldwide regulatory policies while sorting out the up-to-date industrial-sponsored global clinical pipeline updated to April 2026. Centered on a core five-dimensional matching framework integrating EV sources, administration routes, disease indications, critical quality attributes (CQAs) and global regulatory requirements, this work elaborates current translational bottlenecks and commercialization obstacles of EV products. This review provides theoretical support for precision EV therapy optimization, unified quality criterion establishment, international regulatory coordination and accelerated clinical and industrial transformation of EV-based medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.