ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2026
Machine-Learning Based Prognostic Model for Predicting Early Recurrence in HCC Patients After Hepatectomies: An Explainable AI Approach.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Early recurrence within 24 months post-resection remains a primary driver of poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the absence of standardized adjuvant guidelines, robust postoperative risk stratification is critical. We evaluated explainable machine learning (ML) architectures to optimize risk modeling using readily accessible parameters. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 1,681 HCC patients undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy at Chang Gung institutions (2007-2020) as the training cohort. External validation was conducted using an independent cohort (n = 251) from Mackay Memorial Hospital. Four algorithms-random survival forest, Cox-nnet, LASSO, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Missing data were handled via k-nearest neighbors imputation. Discriminative capacity was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), and feature significance was decoded through SHAP values. Results: The XGBoost framework yielded optimal discrimination, achieving a high training C-index of 0.98. During independent external validation, the C-index attenuated to a robust 0.72, reflecting expected adjustments for baseline institutional heterogeneities. Multivariable Cox and SHAP analyses consistently identified five pivotal predictors: sex, preoperative treatment, tumor size, satellite lesions, and vascular invasion. The derived nomogram enabled effective patient risk-tiering ( Conclusion: While the XGBoost model exhibits expected calibration shifts across disparate cohorts, it provides robust, cross-center discriminative generalizability for categorical risk stratification. Rather than serving as an absolute probability estimator, this explainable model functions as a reliable clinical tool to selectively identify high-risk candidates for intensive imaging surveillance. Geographically and ethnically diverse prospective validation remains required prior to broader clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.