ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Towards a bioengineered airway: advances in tracheal tissue engineering and biofabrication.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracheal damage arising from inflammation, trauma, congenital anomalies, or tumors can lead to life-threatening complications, yet current treatments, including surgical reconstruction, stenting, laser therapies, autografts, and allografts, remain inadequate, especially for long-segment defects. As a result, tracheal tissue engineering has emerged as a promising alternative, aiming to create functional biomimetic constructs that reduce dependence on complex surgeries, long-term stenting, and immunosuppression. Advances in additive manufacturing and 3D bioprinting have accelerated progress toward engineered tracheal substitutes; however, a fully functional, clinically viable 3D-bioprinted human tracheal graft has yet to be realized. This review assesses current bioengineering strategies, with a particular emphasis on the interplay between cell sources, scaffold materials, and fabrication methods, specifically focusing on 3D bioprinted tracheal constructs. Across existing studies, the most promising direction lies in multi-material, multicellular, spatially patterned bioprinting approaches that can better recapitulate the trachea's complex biomechanics and heterogeneous tissue composition. Finally, we summarize regulatory considerations and outline key scientific and translational barriers, emphasizing that overcoming challenges in vascularization, innervation, and long-term functional integration will be essential to achieving a physiologically aligned, clinically deployable tracheal substitute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.