Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383247›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026

Towards a bioengineered airway: advances in tracheal tissue engineering and biofabrication.

Palla Ranga Prasad, Praveen Kumar Sahni, Debadrita Mondal, Kirthanashri S Vasanthan, S Varadharajan, Ashwini Kumar, N B Shridhar, Naveena A N Kumar, Bharti Bisht, Kallyanashis Paul and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Palla Ranga PrasadDepartment of Radiation Biology and Toxicology, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Praveen Kumar SahniDepartment of Radiation Biology and Toxicology, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Debadrita MondalDepartment of Radiation Biology and Toxicology, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Kirthanashri S VasanthanManipal Centre for Biotherapeutics Research, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
S VaradharajanManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Ashwini KumarDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
N B ShridharDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Obscure Disease Research Center, Veterinary College Campus, Shivamogga, India.
Naveena A N KumarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Bharti BishtDepartment of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Kallyanashis PaulThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Shayanti MukherjeeThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Manash K PaulDepartment of Radiation Biology and Toxicology, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracheal damage arising from inflammation, trauma, congenital anomalies, or tumors can lead to life-threatening complications, yet current treatments, including surgical reconstruction, stenting, laser therapies, autografts, and allografts, remain inadequate, especially for long-segment defects. As a result, tracheal tissue engineering has emerged as a promising alternative, aiming to create functional biomimetic constructs that reduce dependence on complex surgeries, long-term stenting, and immunosuppression. Advances in additive manufacturing and 3D bioprinting have accelerated progress toward engineered tracheal substitutes; however, a fully functional, clinically viable 3D-bioprinted human tracheal graft has yet to be realized. This review assesses current bioengineering strategies, with a particular emphasis on the interplay between cell sources, scaffold materials, and fabrication methods, specifically focusing on 3D bioprinted tracheal constructs. Across existing studies, the most promising direction lies in multi-material, multicellular, spatially patterned bioprinting approaches that can better recapitulate the trachea's complex biomechanics and heterogeneous tissue composition. Finally, we summarize regulatory considerations and outline key scientific and translational barriers, emphasizing that overcoming challenges in vascularization, innervation, and long-term functional integration will be essential to achieving a physiologically aligned, clinically deployable tracheal substitute.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingbioinkreconstructionregulatory frameworkscaffoldtissue engineeringtrachea

Identifiers

PMID42383247
PMCPMC13315172

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.