Evidence mapPaperPMID 42384126Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026

Timing-dependent renal protection of dapagliflozin in endotoxemic diabetic mice by real-time GFR and biomarkers.

Yu Xiao, Lifeng Shen, Yuchen Song, Yanqi Liu, Yu Xin, Yinghao Luo, Qianqian Zhang, Weiting Zhang, Xinran Wang, Xiuhua Zhang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yu Xiao *Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Lifeng Shen *Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Yuchen Song *Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Yanqi LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Yu XinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Yinghao LuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Qianqian ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Weiting ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Xinran WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Xiuhua ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Xibo WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Pengfei HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Fengye LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Xianglin MengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.
Kaijiang YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China. drkaijiang@163.com.
Changsong WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China. changsongwang@hrbmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2670-3945

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82430069National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos. 82472198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) increases susceptibility to sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI). While guidelines support chronic sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor use in T2DM, their efficacy and optimal intervention timing in acute sepsis remain unclear. We hypothesized that this efficacy is timing-dependent. To test this, we utilized a T2DM mouse model subjected to graded lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenges as a clinically relevant surrogate for sepsis. Notably, to precisely capture the longitudinal and dynamic trajectory of renal function, we incorporated continuous real-time transcutaneous glomerular filtration rate (tGFR) monitoring. We evaluated the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin (DAPA) across three regimens representing distinct clinical scenarios: preventive (pre-LPS only, modeling prior chronic use), therapeutic (initiated post-LPS, modeling de novo intensive care initiation), and whole-course (continuous administration, modeling treatment continuation).

resultsFollowing LPS challenge, T2DM exacerbated renal dysfunction across all doses and impaired endogenous functional recovery. High-resolution real-time tGFR tracking and subsequent biomarker analyses revealed that the renoprotective effect of DAPA was dependent on the timing of intervention. In moderate endotoxemia, both therapeutic and whole-course regimens were superior to the preventive regimen. Compared to preventive administration alone, initiating or continuing treatment during the acute insult (therapeutic and whole-course regimens) more effectively preserved early glomerular filtration rate (GFR) trajectories, attenuated the rise in tubular injury markers, and promoted histological repair.

conclusionsSupported by dynamic renal function monitoring, this study demonstrates that DAPA provides significant renoprotection in a preclinical T2DM model of endotoxemia-associated acute kidney injury. This efficacy is closely associated with the timing of intervention, with greater protective effects observed when treatment is initiated during or maintained after the acute endotoxemic challenge. These preclinical findings suggest that intervention timing could be a key determinant of SGLT2 inhibitor efficacy, providing a scientific rationale for evaluating the prompt initiation or continuation of this therapy in diabetic patients presenting with acute sepsis.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryAKI and critical careDiabetes mellitusDiabetic kidney diseaseEndotoxemiaGlomerular filtration rateLipopolysaccharideSGLT2 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID42384126
PMCPMC13323439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.