ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
Systems modelling of mitochondrial dynamics in different exercise regimes.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exercise stimulates skeletal muscle signalling and mitochondrial metabolism. Emerging evidence shows that mitochondrial dynamics (i.e. fission and fusion) could be regulated by exercise. Yet, key gaps remain in identifying (i) the signals that drive fission vs. fusion; (ii) how energy status and reactive oxygen species (ROS) shift control between dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) and mitofusin (MFN)/optic atrophy 1 (OPA1); and (iii) which intensity-duration combinations yield similar cytosolic signals but different mitochondrial remodelling. Therefore, we developed an integrative computational framework connecting exercise regimens to mitochondria fission-fusion machinery by linking blood-myofibre energetics in cytosol and mitochondria to signalling pathways. The influence of sprint, resistance and endurance exercise regimens on mitochondrial fission and fusion has been simulated. Classified qualitative validation of the signalling network model achieved 80% accuracy. The model predicts regimen-specific dynamics starting with an acute DRP1-driven fission during exercise followed by MFN1/2-OPA1-mediated re-fusion as energy stress declines, consistent with a cyclical triage-then-rebuild paradigm. Changes are most pronounced and sustained with endurance, sharp but brief with sprint, and minimal with resistance. Global sensitivity analysis identified AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1α→MFN1/2 as dominant fusion drivers, ROS and AMPK→mitochondrial fission factor/DRP1 as primary fission switches, and Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.