Evidence mapPaperPMID 42386508Full record

ReviewRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2026

Contemporary Concise Review 2025: Asthma.

Jun Miyata, Koichi Fukunaga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Contemporary Concise Review 2025: Asthma.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun MiyataDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3189-1702
Koichi FukunagaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7460-1990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma research in 2025 further advanced a multidimensional view of asthma, integrating disease trajectory, exacerbation risk, structural airway changes, comorbidities, and treatment responsiveness. In mild asthma, studies published in 2025 further reinforced the importance of anti-inflammatory reliever strategies over SABA-only treatment by supporting timely inhaled corticosteroid delivery at symptom worsening to reduce exacerbation risk, particularly in adults and adolescents, while providing emerging but still nuanced evidence in child. In severe asthma, the therapeutic focus expanded beyond exacerbation reduction towards disease modification, including oral corticosteroid sparing, improvement or normalisation of lung function, reduction of mucus plugging, and attainment of clinical remission. Clinical remission became more clearly defined and increasingly positioned as a treatment target and research endpoint, supported by emerging consensus definitions, real-world data, and analyses of biologic trials. Real-world asthma management increasingly emphasised implementation, including treatable-traits-based care, biomarker-informed stratification, digital inhaler technologies, and approaches to persistent ethnic, social, and age-related inequities in outcomes. Advances in pathobiology highlighted the central role of the airway epithelium, inflammatory cellular ecosystems, microbiome-associated endotypes, mucus-plug biology, and early-life origins of airway remodelling in shaping asthma heterogeneity and progression.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAirway RemodelingDisease ProgressionHumansAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic Agentsairway epitheliumasthmadisease modificationmicrobiomeoral corticosteroidremissiontreatable traits

Identifiers

PMID42386508
PMCPMC13342433

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.