ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-assisted identification and validation of NRP1 inhibitors through molecular docking and dynamics simulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) is a key mediator of tumor metastasis and progression by controlling cancer cell migration, angiogenesis, and tumor immune responses. As a result, NRP1 has recently gained considerable attention as a promising druggable target in cancer therapy. However, there are currently no FDA-approved therapeutics that inhibit NRP1, underscoring the pressing need to identify potent therapeutic candidates. Herein, a hybrid computational workflow integrating machine learning (ML), docking predictions, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations was utilized for hunting potent NRP1 inhibitors from the NCI database. The anticipated active compounds were subsequently docked within the NRP1 active site employing docking predictions. Upon the docking findings, the top-ranking compounds were introduced to MD simulations throughout 250 ns, followed by binding energy (ΔG
Indexed as
Identifiers
42386828What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.