ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Cross-ancestry pleiotropic analysis of imaging-derived phenotypes enhances risk stratification of depression.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression arises from dynamic interactions among genetic predisposition, brain alterations, and environmental stressors. Despite genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identifying risk loci, the mechanisms translating genetic variation into brain changes remain elusive. Imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) were the intermediate traits linking genetic architecture to neural circuit dysfunction. Here, we collected large-scale GWAS summary statistics of depression and IDPs across European (EUR; N = 1,293,933 and 33,224, respectively) and East Asian (EAS; N = 82,874 and 7058, respectively). In the multiple-trait analysis between depression and IDPs, we clarified their genetic correlation through MTAG, identified the pleiotropic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and genes with functional insight, and established the causal relationship through Mendelian randomization via TwoSampleMR in EUR and EAS ancestry, respectively. To discern the heterogeneous genetic drivers, we selected independent SNVs from the multiple-trait analyses to perform unsupervised clustering. Six clusters delineated distinct biological pathways for metabolic regulation, neurotransmitter dynamics, and neuroimmune interactions, with tissue/cell type specificity through MAGMA. Finally, we dissected relationships between depression and polygenic risk score, IDPs, and modifiable lifestyle factors, and introduced a machine learning framework to refine risk stratification (N = 16,166). Our study advanced the understanding of the multiscale etiology of depression while providing dynamic depression risk stratification for precision prevention.
Identifiers
42387104What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.