ReviewPlant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2026
Phytochemical Engineering of Alternative Plant Proteins for Enhanced Nutrition and Digestibility.
Review in Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global protein security is increasingly challenged by the growing demand for sustainable alternatives to animal-derived proteins. Although plant proteins are central to this transition, they remain limited by imbalanced amino acid profiles, reduced digestibility, and inferior techno-functional properties, restricting their nutritional equivalence. Recent studies have explored processing strategies to address these limitations; however, these approaches are often evaluated independently, with limited integration of structural mechanisms and phytochemical-protein interactions. This review presents a comparative and mechanistic synthesis based on cross-study evaluation, integrating protein structure, processing-induced modifications, and phytochemical-assisted interactions. Processing strategies including extrusion, fermentation, enzymatic hydrolysis, and pH shifting primarily enhance protein accessibility and reduce antinutritional constraints. In contrast, phytochemicals modulate protein conformation and interfacial behavior through both non-covalent and covalent interactions. Evidence across studies indicates that these effects are strongly concentration-dependent: moderate phytochemical interactions promote partial unfolding and improved functionality, whereas excessive interactions induce aggregation and reduce digestibility. Notably, the combined application of bioprocessing and phytochemical strategies yields greater improvements in solubility, emulsification, and bioavailability than individual approaches, although variability in protein source and processing conditions remains a key limitation. Overall, this review establishes a mechanistic framework linking protein structure, processing dynamics, and phytochemical interactions, highlighting concentration-dependent effects and synergistic strategies for improving plant protein functionality, while identifying variability and optimization challenges for future applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42387159What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.