ArticleEJNMMI research2026
Automatic lesion segmentation in ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT and ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT: added value of PET-guided SPECT in a bicentric study.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence across oncologic theranostics: evidence for patient stratification, dosimetry, and adaptive radiopharmaceutical therapy.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManual segmentation of prostate cancer metastases on PSMA PET/CT and SPECT/CT is time-consuming and poorly scalable, particularly in highly metastatic patients. This study evaluated nnU-Net-based automatic segmentation models trained on PET and SPECT either separately or jointly and assessed whether PET-derived information can improve SPECT lesion segmentation. Seventy-three patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA were retrospectively included: 48 from the Henri Becquerel Cancer Center (HBCC) and 25 from Nantes University Hospital (NUH). For each patient, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT and ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT were acquired before and during the first treatment cycle respectively. All images were manually segmented by four nuclear medicine physicians in consensus. Four nnU-Net models were trained: M1 (PET/CT only), M2 (SPECT/CT only), M3 (joint PET/CT+SPECT/CT, unimodal input at inference), and M4 (SPECT/CT with PET/CT segmentation as a priori input). Models were first trained and internally validated on HBCC data, then retrained on the full HBCC cohort and externally validated on NUH data.
resultsFor PET/CT segmentation, M1 and M3 achieved comparable performance. M1 reached DSCs of 0.83 ± 0.19 (internal) and 0.76 ± 0.22 (external), while M3 achieved 0.83 ± 0.16 (internal) and 0.77 ± 0.21 (external). For SPECT/CT, the PET-guided model M4 (DSC: 0.63 ± 0.24 internal; 0.78 ± 0.14 external; PPV: 0.65 ± 0.26 internal; 0.75 ± 0.23 external) provided the best results. Compared with the SPECT-only model M2 (DSC: 0.61 ± 0.26 internal; 0.70 ± 0.25 external; PPV: 0.63 ± 0.25 internal; 0.71 ± 0.24 external), M4 showed no statistically significant difference in internal validation (DSC p = 0.35), while being statistically significant in external validation (DSC p = 0.014).
conclusionThe nnU-Net framework enables accurate lesion segmentation on both ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT and ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT. While PET-only and joint PET+SPECT models perform similarly on PET images, incorporating PET-derived segmentations as prior information tends to improve SPECT/CT lesion segmentation. This PET-guided SPECT segmentation strategy leverages the higher spatial resolution of PET and represents a key step towards fully automated extraction of volumetric and dosimetric biomarkers for personalized prostate cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.