ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Integrative analysis of maize and sunflower responses to copper stress reveals species-specific phytoremediation strategies.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCopper (Cu) contamination of arable land threatens crop yields, productivity, and environmental sustainability. While EDTA and IAA can enhance phytoremediation, understanding how different plant species exploit these amendments remains limited. This study tested the hypothesis that maize (Zea mays) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) employ distinct physiological and Cu-accumulation strategies under Cu-induced stress.
methodsIn a controlled pot experiment with 25, 50, and 75 mg kg⁻¹ Cu, applied alone or in combination with soil-applied EDTA (5 mmol kg⁻¹) or with both EDTA and foliar-applied IAA (5 µmol L⁻¹), growth, physiology, antioxidants, and Cu partitioning/distribution of the selected plants were analyzed.
resultsSignificant inhibition occurred in growth, biomass (40% in sunflower; 25% in maize), and photosynthetic pigments (30-35%), along with elevated oxidative stress responses in terms of enzymatic (CAT, APX) and non-enzymatic (flavonoids, phenolics, proline). EDTA alleviated stress by 15-20%, improving growth and pigment retention, while EDTA plus IAA enhanced biomass and pigments by 35-45%, with maize showing the most effective recovery. In remediation, two distinct strategies were identified: maize primarily sequestered Cu in roots (up to 2-fold higher than shoots), reflecting traits suited for phytostabilization, while sunflower efficiently translocated Cu to shoots (translocation factor ~ 3.4), consistent with phytoextraction. The combined application of EDTA and IAA enhanced these inherent strategies. Maize absorbed Cu rapidly at early stages, largely retaining it in roots, whereas sunflower exhibited sustained shoot translocation, highlighting long-term phytoextraction potential.
conclusionsThese findings move beyond simply reporting amendment efficacy, providing a mechanistic, species-specific framework for selecting plants based on remediation goals, rapid stabilization (maize) versus sustained extraction (sunflower), advancing phytoremediation from trial-and-error approaches toward rational, targeted design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.