ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Identification of exosomal miRNA-based predictive signatures for gestational diabetes mellitus via multi-algorithm machine learning.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discovery and validation of a multi-protein panel for predicting non-fatal major adverse cardiovascular events in diabetic kidney disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic disorder during pregnancy, leading to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Exosomal microRNAs (exo-miRNAs) have emerged as promising noninvasive biomarkers due to their stability and regulatory roles in glucose metabolism. However, robust diagnostic models integrating exo-miRNAs profiles for early prediction of GDM remain lacking.
methodsIn this study, we used the GSE192813 dataset as a discovery cohort to identify differentially expressed exo-miRNAs (DE-exo-miRNAs) in exosomes between GDM and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) pregnancies. After differential expression analysis, five machine learning (ML) feature selection algorithms (LASSO, Random Forest, SVM-RFE, XGBoost, and Boruta) were applied to identify robust predictive DE-exo-miRNAs features. Subsequently, ten classification algorithms (including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, KNN, Naïve Bayes, Neural Network, and Decision Tree) were combined with the five feature-selection methods, generating 50 distinct ML models. Model performance was evaluated through repeated 7:3 train-test splits, and the best-performing classifier was externally validated using GSE114860.
resultsA total of 12 DEmiRNAs were identified in GSE192813, of which a subset of key exo-miRNAs (including miR-423-5p, miR-99a-5p, miR-148a-3p, miR-192-5p, and miR-122-5p) were consistently selected across multiple algorithms. Among the 50 ML combinations, the XGBoost + Boruta model achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC exceeding 0.90 and an overall accuracy greater than 90% in the discovery dataset. External validation in GSE114860 demonstrated stable performance, achieving an accuracy above 80% and good calibration. Functional enrichment analysis of target genes indicated significant involvement in insulin signaling, lipid metabolism, and inflammatory pathways.
conclusionThis integrative machine learning framework successfully identified a robust exo-miRNAs-based predictive signature for GDM. The model exhibited high diagnostic accuracy and generalizability across independent cohorts, highlighting its potential for early, noninvasive screening and precision management of gestational diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.