ArticleBMC oral health2026
Deep learning-based dental age classification from panoramic radiographs: a multi-granularity, multi-model comparative study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the performance of a hybrid deep learning architecture, MaxViT-T, for fine-grained dental age estimation (DAE) and coarse-grained age-group classification using panoramic radiographs, and to interpret the model's decision-making process through Explainable AI (XAI). MATERIALS AND
methodsA dataset of n = 2,761 panoramic radiographs from patients aged 6-18 years was used. Two classification tasks were performed: a 13-class fine-grained age estimation and a 3-group coarse-grained age classification (age ranges 6-9, 10-13, and 14-18 years, approximating the early mixed, late mixed, and permanent dentition periods). The hybrid MaxViT-T model was compared against ten other architectures, including CNNs and Transformers, using 5-fold stratified cross-validation. Model interpretability was assessed using Grad-CAM and SHAP.
resultsMaxViT-T achieved the highest performance in both tasks. For the 13-class age estimation, it reached an accuracy of 0.4980 with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.71 years. Tolerance-based accuracy increased to 84.9% and 96.1% within 1 and 2 years, respectively. For the 3-group age classification, the model achieved 91.13% accuracy and an AUC of 0.9669. XAI analyses confirmed that the model's attention shifted from deciduous teeth and erupting permanent teeth in younger ages to third molar development in older ages, predominantly focusing on the mandibular region.
conclusionThe hybrid MaxViT-T architecture achieved the highest accuracy for dental age estimation among the evaluated models, although its advantage over the leading CNN and Transformer architectures was not statistically significant. Its decision behavior aligned with established odontogenic developmental landmarks, supporting the biological plausibility of the learned features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.