ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2026
Long-term use of rozanolixizumab in generalised myasthenia gravis: final pooled analysis of the phase III MycarinG study and two open-label extensions.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Rozanolixizumab in Adult Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
A Randomized, Open-Label Extension Study to Investigate the Long-Term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rozanolixizumab in Adult Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Rozanolixizumab in Study Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by fluctuating and fatigable muscle weakness. In the randomised, double-blind phase III MycarinG study, one 6-week rozanolixizumab cycle significantly improved MG-specific outcomes versus placebo and was generally well tolerated in patients with generalised MG (gMG). Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of cyclic rozanolixizumab treatment. Design: A pooled analysis of the MycarinG, MG0004 and MG0007 studies. Methods: Following MycarinG, eligible patients could enrol in the open-label extension studies MG0004 or MG0007 to receive rozanolixizumab 7 or 10 mg/kg. In MG0004, patients received chronic weekly treatment for ⩽52 weeks. In MG0007, after an initial 6-week treatment cycle, subsequent cycles were based on symptom worsening (investigator's discretion). Final efficacy data were pooled across MycarinG, MG0004 (first 6 weeks) and MG0007 for patients receiving ⩾2 symptom-driven cycles. Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline (CFB) in MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), MG Composite (MGC) and Quantitative MG (QMG) scores. Safety outcomes were assessed in patients who received ⩾1 cycle with a ⩽8-week follow-up period across MycarinG and MG0007. Results: Overall, 188 patients received ⩾1 cycle and 129 received ⩾2 symptom-driven cycles. Across Cycles 1-13, mean (standard deviation) CFB to Day 43 in MG-ADL score ranged from -3.2 (3.3 ( Conclusion: Repeated rozanolixizumab treatment cycles demonstrated consistent, clinically meaningful improvements in MG-specific outcomes as early as 1 week after the first infusion. Rozanolixizumab was generally well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile, supporting its long-term use as a treatment option for adults with gMG. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03971422; NCT04124965; NCT04650854.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.