Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388412›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

The power of the group - Group-based parenting programmes for disadvantaged parents and their infants: a realist review.

Rachel Verweij, Jo Howe, Jolanda Mathijssen, Hedwig van Bakel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel VerweijTilburg University, Tranzo Center for care and wellbeing, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037DB Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Jo HoweAston University, Birmingham, School of pharmacy, B4 7RT Birmingham, UK.
Jolanda MathijssenTilburg University, Tranzo Center for care and wellbeing, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037DB Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Hedwig van BakelTilburg University, Tranzo Center for care and wellbeing, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037DB Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Despite growing evidence of the importance of supporting disadvantaged parents during the first phase of parenthood, most existing parenting programmes targeted at this population are individually delivered, even though group-based programmes are cost-efficient, require fewer personnel (i.e. specialised nurses), and are appreciated by parents, particularly those experiencing social isolation. Given the potential benefits, the aim of this study is to understand how and under what circumstances group-based programmes can work effectively for disadvantaged populations. Methods: We conducted a five-stage realist review to identify the contexts and mechanisms underpinning the delivery of parenting programmes for disadvantaged parents of infants. An initial programme theory was developed. A formal literature search was conducted across five bibliographic databases, supplemented by a Google search and expert advice to identify programmes. Three expert advisory groups comprising parents and professionals played a key role in shaping the review's direction and refining the programme theories. Results: We identified five group-based parenting programmes specifically designed for disadvantaged parents of infants. Twenty-eight documents (scientific and grey literature) were analysed, leading to the development of sixteen context-mechanism-outcome configurations, which were synthesised within six programme theories. These theories were presented within an overarching diagram highlighting the contextual factors and mechanisms which influence parental learning and development. The results were that a non-judgmental, supportive approach and the creation of a safe group space helped parents relax and engage. Parents reported being able to reflect and reframe past experiences, learn from peers and facilitators, strengthen multiple relationships, feel less isolated and feel closer to their infant. Reported outcomes extended beyond improved parent-child interaction and included the development of new support networks, engagement with education and employment, and social participation. Conclusion: Group-based parenting programmes can support disadvantaged parents of infants when they are delivered in ways that align with parents' lived circumstances and social histories. Supportive and non-judgmental group environments appear to trigger mechanisms of trust, emotional safety, and the normalising of shared experiences, enabling parents to engage, reflect on past experiences and learn from peers and facilitators. These mechanisms are more likely to operate when practical and relational barriers to participation (such as mistrust of services, transport difficulties) are addressed. Outcomes extended beyond parenting confidence and parent-infant interaction to include reduced isolation and wider social participation. Future research should focus on how these mechanisms are sustained over time and how they shape longer-term outcomes for parents and children across differing service contexts.

Indexed as

Disadvantaged parentsInfantParent-child relationsParenting educationParenting programmesSocial participationSocial support

Identifiers

PMID42388412
PMCPMC13320447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.