SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Guillain-Barré syndrome following intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review of case reports.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an autoimmune polyradiculopathy linked to various triggers. Recently, several case reports described GBS development following intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception till February 2023 for case reports. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and extracted data using a standardized form. The extracted data were then analyzed narratively. Quality was assessed with the JBI Checklist for Case Reports. Results: Twenty-three cases from 11 countries were identified (14 males, mean age of 60.1 years). Onset of GBS occurred after a median of 9 days (range 2-24) post-ICH, with intracerebral hemorrhage being the most common antecedent (39.1%), followed by subarachnoid (26.1%) and subdural hemorrhage (21.7%). Electrophysiology showed predominantly axonal variants, while CSF consistently demonstrated albuminocytologic dissociation with positive antiganglioside antibodies in five cases. The clinical course was severe, marked by rapid progression to nadir (median 2.5 days), profound functional impairment (average Hughes Functional Grading Scale: 4.57 ± 0.66), and a high rate of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (78.3%). Axonal variants were associated with higher rates of mechanical ventilation and poorer outcomes than demyelinating forms. Among the 21 patients who received immunomodulatory treatment, 3 (14.3%) showed complete recovery, 13 (61.9%) had partial recovery, 3 (14.3%) had a poor recovery, and 2(9.5%) died at last follow up. Conclusion: GBS may complicate recovery after ICH and appears to present with an aggressive course, particularly in axonal variants. Clinicians should consider GBS when patients with ICH develop progressive, symmetrical weakness unexplained by the initial brain injury, as prompt initiation of immunotherapy may improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.