Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388707›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026

Early mobilization in the neurotrauma intensive care unit: a service evaluation of current practice and barriers.

Samantha Rooney, James Hodson, Tammy Lea, Hon Sing Geoffrey Wu, Zubair Ahmed, Niharika A Duggal, Jonathan Weblin, Fiona Howroyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samantha RooneyQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
James HodsonQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Tammy LeaQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Hon Sing Geoffrey WuQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Zubair AhmedQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Niharika A DuggalDepartment of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jonathan WeblinQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Fiona HowroydQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early mobilization (EM) refers to active exercise commenced while patients are on the intensive care unit (ICU). Although the benefits of EM are well established in general ICU populations, evidence specific to the neurotrauma intensive care unit (NTICU) remains limited. This service evaluation aimed to review current EM practices in a single-center NTICU and explore the perceived barriers to EM implementation. Method: A service evaluation was conducted from 5th December 2023 to 28th March 2024, including all patients resident in the NTICU. During this period, patients underwent daily physiotherapy assessments, at which data were prospectively recorded for the suitability for EM, and barriers to EM, where this was not performed. Mobility status was quantified using the Manchester Mobility Scale (MMS), with mobilization defined as an MMS ≥ 2 (i.e., sitting on the edge of the bed or higher). Data for patient characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively collected from the electronic health record system. Results: Of 253 patients included in the service evaluation, EM (i.e., MMS ≥ 2 in the NTICU) was achieved in 149 (58.9%), with a further 76 (30.0%) mobilized on the ward after being discharged from NTICU. The most common primary barriers to EM were sedation (38.4%) and the need for acute medical care (33.9%). Logistical and process issues were the primary barrier to EM in 15.4% of assessments, most commonly insufficient staffing. Conclusion: This service evaluation is the first known report of perceived barriers to EM in a UK-based NTICU. Targeted strategies to address modifiable barriers may facilitate earlier mobilization within major trauma services. Further research is needed to evaluate the safety and impact of NTICU-specific EM protocols.

Indexed as

barriersclinical practicecritical careinjuryphysiotherapyrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42388707
PMCPMC13318685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.