Prediction models for postoperative cognitive dysfunction in adults: a systematic review of methodological quality and clinical applicability.

Background: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is associated with adverse outcomes. Although numerous prediction models have been developed, their methodological quality and clinical applicability remain uncertain. Methods: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies that developed POCD prediction models in adults. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using CHARMS (Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies) and PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool). Results: From 2,060 initial records, 13 studies comprising 14 prediction models were included. Models were developed using logistic regression ( Conclusion: Current prediction models for POCD show promising discriminatory performance, but their evaluation has been limited by short follow-up periods, a lack of external validation, and limited sample sizes, thus precluding their current clinical use. Future research should leverage large prospective cohorts, incorporate longitudinal multi-timepoint predictors that are routinely evaluated in clinical settings, extend follow-up to capture the full POCD course, and prioritize rigorous external validation to develop clinically applicable models. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024622477.