Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388955›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Virtual Reality in Physical Rehabilitation: A Review of Machine-Learning Kinematics, Educational Scaffolding, and Treatment Adherence Strategies.

Magalli Diaz Bravo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Magalli Diaz BravoRehabilitation Science (AI and Digital Health), Independent Researcher, San Francisco, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical rehabilitation increasingly depends on interventions that are intensive, personalized, and sustained outside the clinic. Yet contemporary rehabilitation systems face persistent barriers, including workforce shortages, geographic inequities, rising costs, fragmented follow-up, and poor adherence to home exercise programs. This comprehensive review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR) can function together as a digital therapeutic framework for physical rehabilitation. The review argues that the core problem is not simply the absence of technology but the absence of continuous, meaningful supervision between clinic visits. AI-driven pose estimation, multimodal sensing, low-latency feedback, explainable analytics, and adaptive exercise progression allow rehabilitation programs to move from episodic observation to real-time, data-informed guidance. At the same time, principles of adult learning and motor learning help explain why immersion alone is not enough unless the system also teaches, motivates, and gradually transfers responsibility to the patient. Across musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiovascular, oncological, and chronic pain populations, the evidence suggests that VR-supported rehabilitation can improve engagement, exercise capacity, movement quality, and patient satisfaction, particularly when paired with personalized coaching and home-based monitoring. This paper therefore proposes AI-VR rehabilitation not as a replacement for clinicians, but as a clinically governed co-pilot that extends supervision, strengthens adherence, and expands equitable access to therapy.

Indexed as

adherence to therapyartificial intelligence (ai)digital therapeuticseducational technologyexplainable artificial intelligence (xai)kinematic analysismachine learningphysical medicine and rehabilitation (pm&r)telerehabilitationvirtual reality-based rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42388955
PMCPMC13322571

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.