ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2026
A Review of Therapies for Primary Biliary Cholangitis.
Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare, chronic, progressive autoimmune cholestatic liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis if left untreated. Ursodeoxycholic acid remains the standard first-line therapy; however, approximately 40% of patients exhibit an inadequate or partial biochemical response, and approximately 5% to 10% of patients are intolerant to the drug. Consequently, there remains a substantial need for effective second-line agents. Until recently, obeticholic acid (OCA) and fibrates were the only available second-line therapies. However, the therapeutic landscape for PBC has evolved significantly with the US Food and Drug Administration conditional approval of elafibranor and seladelpar as second-line therapies for patients without cirrhosis. Notably, OCA has been withdrawn as an available treatment option, further shifting the current treatment paradigm. This article aims to examine the current pharmacologic landscape of first-line and second-line PBC treatments, with an emphasis on clinical considerations and strategies for individualized treatment selection to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42389015PMC13322329What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.