ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Soft skills and potential covariates in first year health science students in Latin America: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Latin American health education institutions traditionally prioritize technical skills over "soft" psychosocial competencies. However, empathy and resilience are vital for quality clinical care. This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties, gender differences, and correlations between soft skills (empathy, resilience) and psychosocial covariates (affect, family functioning, satisfaction with life) in first-year students. Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 896 first-year students (59% female, 41% male) from Dentistry, Kinesiology, and Nursing programs at three universities in Chile. Participants completed five validated instruments: JSE-HPS (Empathy), EEA (Resilience), PANAS (positive and negative affect), FACES-20 (Family Functioning), and SWLS (Satisfaction with Life). Data were analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Pearson correlations. Results: CFA confirmed adequate structural validity and reliability for most scales, though gender invariance was only strictly met for affect and family functioning. Significant gender differences were observed: men scored higher in compassionate care, positive affect, and engineering/adaptive resilience, while women scored higher in perspective taking and negative affect. Resilience showed moderate positive correlations with positive affect ( Conclusion: The study provides a psychometric foundation for assessing soft skills in Latin American health students. The results highlight the need for early risk gender and sub dimensions adjusted profiling to identify students more susceptible of soft skill decline during training. Furthermore, further research is needed to develop training interventions to improve soft skills during academic years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.